(8 minute read)
Simpler times.
Some of my fond childhood memories come from those times when I was supposed to be in bed and would sneak to a position where I could overhear the grownups talk. Listening to my parents or at family gatherings grandparents, aunts and uncles, I would get to hear people that I cared about expressing differing positions on various issues of the times.
As kids we were just told to be wary of strangers. Nowadays People of Color have to instruct their children how to be safe in their interactions with police. Those were simpler times compared to now. Simpler because so many things were ignored or not known. Have we gained more than we lost?
The jury is still out.
I can only imagine.
I often see conservative parents posting comments about telling their children not to trust news media or a wide group of other sources including the government, police, courts, teachers, etc. They are grooming a generation of children to be just as fatalistic about our society as they are with perceived threats everywhere.
What do their children think that the world is like? A world where everyone is suspect; where everyone is out to get them. The world that they as parents are helping create.
What a sad way to raise children.
It’s a matter of trust.
Back in December of 2020 NPR posted an article that deals with a lot of what I am talking about in this post about trust.[1] You can click on the link provided in the endnotes. It’s worth the read. I pulled the quote below from the article. It’s one of many.
"We don't trust the government. We don't trust the Congress. We don't trust the Supreme Court. We don't trust now the science. We don't trust medicine. We don't trust the media for sure," Kruglanski said. "So who do we trust? Well, we trust our tribe. We trust conspiracy theories that tell us what we want to hear."
Conservatives don’t trust the government even when Republicans are in charge. That goes clear back to President Reagan when Republicans started their push to eviscerate our form of government.[2] Only thirty-five percent of Americans approve of the job that Congress is doing now.[3] And that’s a 12 year high. (Dems 61%. Reps 8%.) Ironically the people that they vote into office also tell people that government isn’t to be trusted and then through their actions validate what they’re saying about others.
Self-fulfilling prophecy.
Do your own research.
There’s a funny video called “if Google was a guy” that has been circulating on social media. In one scene a woman asks if vaccines are safe.[4] The guy behind the desk puts his hand on a stack of papers and says something about here are a million results saying vaccines are safe and one that says they aren’t. Guess which one she picked? Yep. She picked the one.
That’s what people do. It’s called confirmation bias.[5] Essentially it means that people believe what they want to believe and only believe sources that back them up. I’ll see conservatives sharing a meme or post headlined with “MEDIA ISN’T REPORTING THIS” usually with instructions to be shared with the known world. Often, I’ll have already seen several factual articles already posted on the subject by traditional media.
Back in 2016 when Clinton was running for President a friend shared an email about all the evil that Clinton had done. It was repackaged previous submissions of all the evil that the Clintons had done. Years before that I had spent literally hundreds of hours looking this stuff up to see if any of it was true. None of it was true. I even found audio recordings of meetings where I could hear her saying the opposite of what it was claimed that she said. I provided references and sources. The friend was uninterested. Her defense was that it was all stuff that she believed the Clintons were capable of doing. Facts were of ZERO interest to her. ZERO. BTW there is no such thing as alternative facts.
Things haven’t gotten better.
The circle is unbroken.
I still do fact checking and source checking. The source is often the easiest way to determine whether something will probably end up being true. If the source is usually unreliable then there’s a high probability that what they’re reporting needs to be checked for accuracy.
I have written before about how people can check their sources of information. It was a 14 minute read. I also provided a list of places to check information. I just finished reformatting it. It was one of my older posts and I have changed the way I present stuff since then.
Sadly, what I wrote still holds true today. The average person isn’t all that interested in being truthful or posting the truth. It’s bothersome. It’s easier to say trust no one and just pass along all the input that one would like to be true.
One quick point that I want to touch upon is that a lot of right-wing fascist sites are their own sources. In other words, they link to one another the misinformation that they’re sharing as being their source. They all share the same made-up crap and link to each other as being reliable sources that they got their “information” from.
What goes around comes around.
The truth is out there.
I don’t really need to do my own research. I don’t need to become a doctor to know that masking and vaccines work. Generations of science have taught us the truth of the matter. The truth really isn’t all that hard to come by. And yes, mainstream media is reliable and has been for decades. On a regular basis I check news from left to right and vice versa. MSNBC was on the left with Fox News on the right and several sources in between.
Are the sources I use biased? Sure, but not all of them. Besides I use right and left biased sites when it’s necessary. I’m biased. That doesn’t mean that I use my bias to post false information or lies. I’m not looking to confirm what I think as being the truth. I am looking to see if what I believe (think) is the truth. I use Media Bias Fact Check to see if a source/news outlet is credible. They provide a detailed analysis of the source being checked. They also differentiate between opinion and news in their rating.
If you look up Occupy Democrats at Media Bias here’s what they say, “Overall, we rate Occupy Democrats Questionable due to far left-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, and the publication of fake news as evidenced by numerous failed fact checks.” Obviously Occupy Democrats is NOT of good source for getting factual information.
How does Reuters fare? “Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.” According to Media Bias.
Our old reliable news sources that have been around for generations as well as some newer ones are there and are credible without being overly biased. They rate close to neutral (center/left center/right center) in terms of being biased and highly factual. These are all trustworthy: AP, Reuters, NPR, BBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Pew Research Center, along with hundreds more. It only takes seconds to look a news source or post up. Checking a post usually takes me less than 15 seconds. Anyone can do it. Doesn’t seem like a huge burden.
LT15
Talking heads.
Now, I’m talking about news not opinion/commentary. I stopped checking with Fox News on a regular basis because they ceased being a good source of news. I don’t expect news from Carlson[6] or Hannity[7]. The same holds true for Rachel Maddow. I enjoy her “reporting” but don’t use her as a source unless I’ve verified what she presents.
Why anyone has faith regarding Fox News is beyond me. In the recent release of their internal communications it’s now a matter of record that Fox knew what their talking heads like Hannity and Carlson were saying is false.[8] Hannity, Carlson, Ingraham and their other talking heads knew it. They were telling fascist MAGA heads the lies they wanted to hear.
But we have problems these days in that there is more commentary wrapped around what I would call the elements of traditional news. The 5 Ws of who, what, when, where and why. (FWIW I had a minor in Journalism.) It’s where the bias creeps in. The facts should still be there.
Neo-Republican Fascists are claiming that we’re losing freedom because of censorship. They want their lies presented and accepted as facts and truth. A couple of decades ago they decided that the truth being reported about their goals was unacceptable. The truth is counterproductive to them accomplishing their agenda. I covered that in my post about them (Republican Fascists)
saying the quiet part out loud.
[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/12/15/946381523/right-wing-embrace-of-conspiracy-is-mass-radicalization-experts-warn
[2] Regan 9 words video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhYJS80MgYA
[3] https://news.gallup.com/poll/329945/congressional-job-approval-highest-nearly-years.aspx
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJD1Iwy5lUY&list=PLuKg-Whduhklge1dMCGsemN1Qr_ODqjtZ&index=3
[5] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/science-choice/201504/what-is-confirmation-bias
[6] https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ulx6QozL5DU
[8] https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3863605-five-top-revelations-from-dominions-explosive-court-filing-in-fox-news-lawsuit/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please avoid name calling, personal and/or abusive language. In other words be civil. We need a lot more of that these days. Try and confine your comments to the topic of the post.